Talk:Embezzlement/Archives/2014
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Embezzlement. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The usage of Peculate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is up for discussion, see Talk:Peculate (band) -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 08:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
The usage of Peculator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is up for discussion, see talk:Peculator -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
separation of duties, movie ticket example
"Because a ticket cannot be printed without entering the sale into the computer (or, in earlier times, without using up a serial-numbered printed ticket), and the customer cannot enter the theater without a ticket, both of these employees would have to collude in order for embezzlement to go undetected."
This is a poor example. A person can enter a theatre without a ticket if an usher allows them; collusion is unnecessary.