Talk:Elmwood Casino

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice job on the article. You might want to consider moving the notable performers section to after the memorable engagements, and convert it to list form.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few explanations and observations from my changes;

It's not necessary to attribute facts to people, unless they're disputed. A simple cite to the reliable source that verifies it suffices.
Opinions are a different matter. If the article is offering an opinion, it should be attributed. Even things like calling it "popular" and "swanky" is an opinion.
Leads should focus on hard facts. Opinions can come later.
There was too much direct quoting of the sources and people. Summarise things in your own words, unless there is something particular about the way it was said that should be reflected.
The stuff about Segal outside of his ownership of the casino doesn't belong here. If he is notable in himself, maybe an article devoted to him would be better for this.
I removed some tangents about Detroit and the Brentwood Recovery Home. This article is not the place for discussing them.
"curly" quotes should not be used.
Italics have a particular use in Wikipedia.

--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]