Talk:Ella Cruz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Removing "in character" image?

@Davey2010: For others interested, this is about this image removal, where Davey writes: (Rm image - character images should be on the chaarcter articles only). I don't think that's true. For example, look at John Wayne where not just the first, but nearly every single photo, is of John Wayne "in character". The point of a photo is to tell the user what the article subject looks like. This photo does that. I mean, I might be able to see the argument that if Cruz were heavily made up in character that it doesn't really tell the user what she looks like, if we had a better one, but in this case, (a) we don't have any other image, so this one is clearly better than nothing, and (b) in it, she just looks like herself. In fact, I'm not so sure she is "in character" - she is being interviewed about her role in the movie, it's not an excerpt from the movie, I'm not at all sure that is her costume in the movie, it's just a hooded sweatshirt, are you sure that isn't just something she threw on between scenes? I haven't seen the film, have you? --GRuban (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GRuban - I've self reverted ? .... Character images uploaded to WP can't actually be put in any article except the character however I wasn't aware that this A) was taken from YT and B) uploaded to Commons hence why I reverted, Regardless of whether the face is shown or their whole body It still should only be on that article however all that doesn't apply here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ella Cruz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151118180014/http://www.tempo.com.ph/2012/06/26/getting-to-know-ella-cruz/ to http://www.tempo.com.ph/2012/06/26/getting-to-know-ella-cruz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why my fix in the page is removed?

Hello, my fix on the page was removed, it was the "and is", it was supposed to fix a issue that might conflict with the left side of ref. [3] that only uses a comma? official_frar (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]