Talk:Elektronika

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seeking clarification

Before I came to this article, the lead sentence ran like this:

Elektronika was the brand name used for many different electronic products such as calculators, electronic watches, portable games and radios.

I changed it to say it was a "brand name" in the Soviet Union, which seemed cleared I guess from the context. But I wonder if fact in Elektronika wasn't a state company rather than just a brand name, but I don't know the facts here. I also don't know what happened to Elektronika after the end the Soviet Union; does it still exist in some form?--Pharos 08:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet names are a bit difficult since brand name and factory name can be different. For instance the Lada is made by VAZ. // Liftarn (talk)

"nowadays, in Russia." - I thought Electronika watches are now made in Belarus? 91.85.181.111 (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image gallery

I think there are too many images in the image gallery of handheld games. The basic appearance is representative of the entire line of games, the only differences being some graphics. A few images should suffice. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling in Latin script

Is mostly Electronika (e.g. [1] [2]), but sometimes Electronica (e.g. [3]). I don't think I've ever seen anything marked Elektronika by the company, but if anyone has sources, then please show them. Rapido (talk) 09:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[4]. Burzuchius (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the spelling to Elektronika, as I think is the case with all the product articles. – Fayenatic London 23:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electronika. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040902090749/http://www.taswegian.com/MOSCOW/soviet.html to http://www.taswegian.com/MOSCOW/soviet.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]