Talk:Electronic Literature Organization

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles

Copyright violation?

User:Praxidicae just reverted this article back five years due to an "egregious copyvio", but the Copyvio report says "Violation unlikely" with 17.4% identical text - and it's mostly stuff like the names of the founders and so on. I haven't come across the copyvio issue on Wikipedia before, and after reading Wikipedia:Copyright problems I still don't understand how much overlap between an original text and the Wikipedia page is understood to be problematic - that page seems to be describing much more obvious cases of plagiarism. In this article, it seems like the identical phrases are mostly statements of facts - they could be paraphrased, but would that really help? Is the issue that they need to be referenced? I want to fix the page without making any mistakes, so would appreciate advice - perhaps there is a discussion somewhere with more explicit guidelines about this. Lijil (talk) 07:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it's not a copyvio now because I removed the offending text. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 ELO awards

HI Here are the 2022 ELO awards, but they are not up on a site yet. They were announced during the 2022 ELO conference. Can I list them on wikipedia? Hayles Award: “Critical Making, Critical Design” edited by Lai-Tze Fan Runner-Up: “Twining: Critical and Creative Approaches to Hypertext Narratives” by Anastasia Salter and Stuart Moulthrop Honorable Mention: “Bitstreams: The Future of Digital Literary Heritage” by Matthew Kirschenbaum

Coover Award: “ReRites” by Jhave Runner-Up: “Travesty Generator” by Lillian-Yvonne Bertram Honorable Mention: “Al-Barrah (البرَّاح)” by Reham Hosny and Mohamed A. Nasef

Luesebrink Award: Alan Sondheim LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get this in the scope of WP:WELW?

HI, could we also note that this is in the scope of Women Electronic Literature Writers? How would we do that? Thanks! LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]