Talk:Elder law (Massachusetts)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Elder law (United States)#Elders in the United States|Elder law (United States), Elders in the United States]]
[[Elder law (U.S.)#Elder Law Attorneys|Elder law (U.S.), Elder Law Attorneys]]
[[Elder law (U.S.)#Assessing Professional Competence|Elder law (U.S.), Assessing Professional Competence]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Content removal

I removed about 2/3rds of the article, it was either an outline or how too guide that is no appropriate for inclusion, see WP:NOTHOWTO. I found some copyvio in the middle of it, but can not substantiate that the rest of it was copyvio. In the end its status as copyvio is moot because I think it is proper to remove it either way, the content had not been improved in years, and I don't think its likely it was going to be. Monty ₈₄₅ 02:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations Needed

This whole entry has not even one citation. 68.55.215.193 (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]