This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
She's a prominent opponent of gays in the military. [1] She's constantly quoted in the press. Deleting the article won't make her go away. Better to write about what annoying twit she is (i.e., as her opponents regard her). --Uncle Ed (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If she is "prominent", there would be significant coverage about her in independent reliable sources. This does not seem to be the case. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been PRODed three times now. I did the first, but would never have done the 2nd or 3rd, because it is against the policy here. By definition, a PROD is for "uncontested deletion". No rationale has to be given to remove a PROD tag (one of the few times removing a maintenance tag is ok without summary), it just means that the deletion is contested. If someone wants to AFD it, so be it, but continuing to PROD the article after it is already established that deletion is NOT "uncontested" can only be seen as disruptive. If there is any question, consult WP:PROD which CLEARLY STATES: An article may be PRODed only once. It also clearly states If any person (even the author him/herself) objects to the deletion (usually by removing the --proposed deletion-- tag - see full instructions below), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed. It also goes on to CLEARLY SAY that giving a rationale to removing a PROD is NOT required. Obviously, it is preferred, but it is never required. Now can we please be done with this silly PROD war. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
