Talk:Einstein versus Oppenheimer

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reply

@S0091: thank for your quick feedback. Let me just quickly answer to some of it to see if you can help me get it on the main. (1) I removed the link to Chess Life archives, yet pages numbers and dates are already there. (2) What do you mean by Please cite the specific source with the relevant bibliographic details, could you please take a look at the references and tell me what I am missing? (3) While Chesshistory is a blog like source I am using a piece of Chess Notes a bimonthly column written by Edward Winter (chess historian) and professional in chess history, alternative I could use Chess base. Again thank you for your time. ReyHahn (talk) 20:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ReyHahn Apologies for the lack of clarify. I meant the url needs to go to the specific source rather than a home page. I have updated it. As far as Winters, yes I agree with you he meets WP:BLOG exception as he is a subject matter expert. To be honest, I am not sure about the draft being acceptable given the issues with WP:V and the sources to which I have access are only brief mentions (Chess Life, The Psychology of Chess Skill and based on what Winter's states). It might be a good idea to post a note at WP:WikiProject Chess to get opinions. S0091 (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Understood, let me add some more links to the source. I also have contacted WP:Wikiproject Chess, let's wait for somebody there. --ReyHahn (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ReyHahn thanks. You are still welcome to resubmit it as another reviewer may take a look in the interim which will also provide another opinion. S0091 (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Max Oppenheimer

Bill Wall's entry on Einstein says that Another source says that Black was not Robert Oppenheimer the physicist, but Max Oppenheimer (1885-1954), the European artist. I would prefer to not add this unless somebody can provide which source is it. Also this entry was published in a magazine that avoided to include that speculation. ReyHahn (talk) 13:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]