Talk:Eight Belles

Vandalism

Might want to put a lock on this article. There's already been some vandalism.24.187.134.112 (talk) 22:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second that. There is more than "some" vandalism. (HairMetalLives (talk) 22:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Already requested it. --Smashville^BONK! 23:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.24.187.134.112 (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems premature to protect this. I'm keeping an eye out, through.--Bedford 23:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the PETA stuff as Vandalism. It's part of the events around the death. No matter what you think of PETA (and I find it personally funny that they are up in arms over the death of any animal when they kill so many themselves), I didn't see the language used to describe the events as being colored. However, if it takes up too much of the entry then perhaps a single statement about PETA taking issue would be better. Also, those keeping better track of what is being said can add in the news reports where people state, "This kind of thing just happens sometimes." --Cozret (talk) 12:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barbaro Connection

The point everyone is missing is that these horses are being run into the ground before they are fully mature. I have trained horses for over 30 years and I would not consider putting a saddle and a rider on a horse until they are 3. These racehorses are being pushed way too soon and that is the reason for the breakdowns.

I can't edit the page myself because it's locked, but she and Barbaro share the same "grandfather", Mr. Prospector. Other horses related to him have had similar injuries, including Smarty Jones (chronic ankle bruising causing his retirement), Afleet Alex (cannon bone fracture), and Smart Strike (condylar fracture). Bad genes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 00:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Way too original researchy...although you are right that Mr. P and Northern Dancer seem to get overrun in pedigrees of less sound horses. --Smashville^BONK! 00:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I will definitely be on the lookout for that kind of story, and if reported anywhere, I'll see to it its included.--Bedford 00:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Her sire was retired at age 4 after a fractured hoof, and she's also related through Mr. Prospector to Anees (fractured pastern, euthanized), Grindstone (leg fracture), and Birdstone (bone chip). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, way too original researchy. Many, many, many horses get bone chips and other injuries. --Smashville^BONK! 01:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've been around them for some time. But it seems that the percentage of descendants of Mr. Prospector that have large injuries like this are greater than in other bloodlines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 01:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably because there are a larger number of Mr. P descendants. But...I mean, if you went with only the prominent ones...you could say that based on Rags to Riches, Jazil and Invasor, the Blushing Groom line throws unsoundness. The fact of the matter is that it's still relative. For every Mr. P descendant retiring or dying due to an injury, there are several more that retired healthy. I mean, Unbridled died, but due to colic. --Smashville^BONK! 01:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about a percentage of his descendants as opposed to a percentage of racehorses (though most prominent ones are related to him somehow) with no direct recent (past 5-6 generations) connections to him. Something just seems off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 01:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just got done reading an article from the Wall Street Journal called Racing's Royal Bloodlines. It underscores what you say. Barbaro was from Mr. Prospector, and so was Eight Belles. But that's not all. The bloodlines of 8 of the top contenders all trace back to Native Dancer (who won many races, but is most remembered for his second place in the 1953 Kentucky Derby prior to retirement) and Nasrullah, a stallion from Britian born in 1940 who's decendents include Secretariat and Seattle Slew. There appears to be an incredible amount of inbreeding taking place in America's thoroughbred bloodlines.

This is not the first time I've heard this. Some of my appraisal clients are into the race horse industry and say the very same thing. The Native Dancer decendants are reported to have heavily muscled legs, and take long, super thrusting strides. This is coupled with a genetic tendency toward weaker bones in the legs, and causes a dangerous combination as we've seen twice in the past several years.

Today's race horse owners and breeders appear to invest so much, that they feel the genetic chance at a champion is a necessary. It's also been said by many that the bloodlines really don't contribute much to the chance of a champion. It's far more related to the training. Now, before you say 'bull hockey', think about it. Those who have the money to pay $300,000 for a yearling or nearly that much for a stud fee, also have the money to pay for an awesome trainer or set of trainers. Who's to say the majority of the horse's success is due to bloodlines rather than the animal's heart to win and a good trainer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinka82 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean this in the nicest way possible...but you guys will need to find another forum if you want to discuss this any further. This talk page is for discussion of the article. --Smashville^BONK! 00:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see some of what was included on this talk page included in the article, as I said before, but unfortunately I can't edit it with it being locked. I was laying out the facts, which many in the industry know about the Mr. Prospector/Unbridled line.

Again...Wikipedia has strict policies against original research. And if anything, wouldn't that belong in the Mr. Prospector article? --Smashville^BONK! 02:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is in no way "original research". Recent articles in the New York Times mention the established connection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 05:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can find an article that specifically says "Eight Belles fractured her ankles because of her lineage" or something like that, then it is entirely original research and speculation. --Smashville^BONK! 13:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smashville, why did you remove the link to the Native Dancer page? That horse is generally agreed to be the ancestor of the generational troubles we see today, and is the only horse not mentioned now, since you removed it. Please read the papers. You will see that this is not "original research" (your words). If you agree, please restore it. Thank you. JohnClarknew (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would have read my edit summary, I said we didn't need to start listing her entire pedigree when it's already on the page. It had nothing to do with original research and everything to do with not duplicating information. --Smashville^BONK! 20:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But if you will re-read the page, you will find no mention of Native Dancer, the source of the current pedigree problem that everyone's talking about now! Please link and look at it, this is serious. JohnClarknew (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are putting that information in to try and influence the reader, then it violates WP:NPOV. If you are putting it in based on an unsourced and unconfirmed theory, then it violates WP:OR. There is no reason to make a passing reference of a horse in her pedigree that is 4 generations back. --Smashville^BONK! 21:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your insistence of keeping out sourced information and facts and published theories relevant to this article is itself evidence of violation of WP:NPOV, and it's not mine. Your ref to WP:OR is preposterous. I have put back the name and link to Native Dancer. JohnClarknew (talk) 22:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have referenced it with an opinion piece. It is a theory and it is irrelevant. This is an encyclopedia article. You have already mentioned that your purpose is to influence people's opinions. We do not speculate on Wikipedia. Speculation is original research. The fact of the matter is that her pedigree is already listed on the page. There is no proven link between Mr. Prospector, Native Dancer and breakdowns. The only purpose of adding it would be to sway the reader's opinion. --Smashville^BONK! 23:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smashville, you have again removed that which offends you. I don't think you have that right, citing WP directives which I think are misplaced. I have requested review from others. JohnClarknew (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruffian Connection

I don't know if Eight Belles was related to Ruffian at all, but this isn't the first time a champion filly has had a heart stronger than her legs. Champion Thoroughbred filly Ruffian who went undefeated until her death after breaking down in a nationally televised match race at Belmont Park on July 6, 1975 against the Kentucky Derby winner, Foolish Pleasure. She broke 2 sesamoid bones and was euthanized on the surgical table in a failed attempt to repair her.Harddraver (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much all thoroughbreds are genetically related somehow, but Ruffian and Eight Belles were genetically related through some recent relatives. Nearco, Pharos, Nogara, Native Dancer, Polynesian, and Geisha are all horses that are genetically tie Ruffian and Eight Belles. It's also worth noting that inbreeding is extremely common in thoroughbreds, and seen more often than not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment: Eight Belles and Native Dancer

Whether a link and controversial sourced comment can be banished from a page. 00:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Statements by editors previously involved in dispute

Eight Belles, the horse that was very publicly put down after the 2008 Kentucky Derby, has been referenced to being part of the progeny of a 4-generations-back ancestor, the famous Native Dancer, leading to weakness in her ankles. The majority of today's U.S. race horses are similarly at risk, according to a critical editorial in the L.A. Times [1]. There has already been much discussion and comment in the current press. User Smashville seeks to keep this information out of the Eight Belles article, and deletes the information. JohnClarknew (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Smashville seeks to keep this information out of the article citing requirements of neutral point of view, however the fact that it is receiving mainstream press seems to make its inclusion a necessary part of the article just to keep it neutral. I do not believe user Smashville should be allowed to continue editing this article, as obviously he/she has a biased opinion and is allowing it to reflect in this article.

Comments

Not sure why this is considered controversial. The Native Dancer lineage has been mentioned in the press - eg: Denver Post, and Wall Street Journal. I don't see a problem including it in the article. J. Van Meter (talk) 01:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It already is mentioned. Her pedigree is on the page. You can click Raise a Native and see who his sire was. It's one thing to say, "her lineage traces back to Mr. Prospector and Native Dancer". It's another to say "Mr. Prospector is in her bloodlines on both her sire and dam's sides, as well as her bloodline to Native Dancer four generations back. That connection has led to published controversy regarding issues relating to overbreeding." One of those is clearly biased and is based entirely on opinion and no proven fact. --Smashville^BONK! 02:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not based entirely in opinion, which is why the Wall street Journal, Denver Post, and LA Times have all published articles on this topic. It is not the fact that these horses are in her lineage; it is their effect on her bone structure, which should be included in her article. The issue here is the fact that Mr. Prospector's lines are potentially leading to injury-prone horses, and it should be at the very least included in the main article as a source of controversy. To not include it at all is to deny the validity of the existence of the issue.

The only "sources" are opinion articles. The issue here is that there is no proof, there are no reliable sources and it creates an utter bias. --Smashville^BONK! 04:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only biased one is yourself, Smashville. The lack of inclusion of a theory based on the personal bias of the person repeatedly editing the Wikipedia page is not in any way neutral. If anything, at the bare minimum, as I have stated before, it should be included as a source of controversy, because it has been in many major respected publications. Your refusal to see even that shows just who it is here who is attempting to slant this article to their own viewpoint. Also, on the page for the events of September 11, 2001, it includes a reference to the conspiracy theories surrounding the event. Have those been proven? Of course not. But because they exist, and have been discussed, they deserve mention. There is an entire Wikipedia page for conspiracy theories surrounding September 11th, 2001. Things do not have to be proven to deserve mention in Wikipedia; this is not the science channel. It's a place where if it gets mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, and other major media sources, it should at least get a quick blurb in the main article, no matter the personal bias of a rogue editor.

I'm biased by not wanting to show a bias? This isn't a conspiracy theory and this isn't 9/11. This is an encyclopedia article about a horse. Unless you can provide reliable sources, adding that information doesn't even remotely adhere to a neutral point of view. --Smashville^BONK! 05:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact remains that the possibility that the Mr. Prospector line has resulted in a horse more likely to go lame has been discussed in major news media. It has been widely discussed in public news forums, and as such, should be included in the wikipedia article, even marked as a source of controversy. To refuse to do so is selective editing, and editing with a bias. Just because you do not believe something to be true (or maybe you have an interest in it not being true?) does not mean that it should not follow the same standards as every other article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.175.25 (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Point of order. Native Dancer was written in to the page, and then edited out, leading to this discussion. Where's the burden? Does it stay in until resolution, or stay out until resolution? JohnClarknew (talk) 06:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then how 'bout we pull the pedigree chart out one or two more generations: that will give a picture of how the Raise a Native/Native Dancer line is doubled up in Eight Belles via Mr. Prospector. J. Van Meter (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point: I believe that the discussion that has been going on in the media (Wall Street Journal, LA Times, etc) regarding the Native Dancer and Mr. Prospector lines and a predisposition to injury should be included at the very least under a "Controversy" heading. To deny the existence of the controversy is biasing the article.

Another article from the Wall Street Journal, this time quoting the owner of Eight Belles, and citing proceedings seeking solutions at a seminar on horse breeding [2]. But I suppose Smashville would call this "opinion", and should not appear in the article. JohnClarknew (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it were opinion, which I don't believe it is, the fact is that the issue of her breeding contributing to her death is being discussed in major news sources such as the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, and Denver Post. This in and of itself is enough to warrant its inclusion on the main page. Not including it has biased the main page.FlyingChanges (talk) 19:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes, adding a "Controversy" section makes the most sense -- a la Mark McGwire article. J. Van Meter (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with a controversy section or adding generations on the pedigree. The only problem I had was with the wording and drawing our own conclusions. And JohnClark, an editorial IS opinion. That's why I said it is not a reliable source. It's not my personal opinion...it is a simple fact...editorials are opinion. --Smashville^BONK! 18:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That "editorials are opinion" is your opinion, Smashville, and THAT'S a simple fact! Oh boy, if we're going to deal in analytic philosophy and Sartrean existentialism, we can make a case that all fact is actually opinion. Anyway . . . now that this is out of the way, let's fix it with a controversy section and end this discussion. Thanks to everyone who contributed. JohnClarknew (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my opinion that editorials are opinion...it's a fact. Editorials are opinion columns. That's what they are. But whatever. This is resolved. --Smashville^BONK! 13:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lastword Smashville JohnClarknew (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siblings

Did Eight Belles have any siblings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.110.74 (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Disambiguation

The page automatically redirects from "Eight Bells," which strictly speaking is a nautical term. There either needs to be a disambiguation page including Ship's bell or a redirect to that page.User:Namekal

Eight Belles Website

Eight Belles does have an offical website. Have a good weekend. Sincerly, (~~71.68.223.17~~)

I think it is terrible she died, in that way. I have an ex-racehorse and she is terrified of the whip and the race track because she used to have a horrible owner. Now she is ride-able except with a whip and a racetrack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.191.115.61 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eight-Belles before the 2008 Kentucky Derby May 3 2008.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Eight-Belles before the 2008 Kentucky Derby May 3 2008.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eight Belles- Kentucky Derby '08.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Eight Belles- Kentucky Derby '08.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Eight Belles- Kentucky Derby '08.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cruelty to animals

Considering the controversy section, and the reliable source that I've added, I consider this to be notable and correctly cited content. Thanks Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Placing this article in the Category:Cruelty to animals along with illegal activities as Dog fighting in the United States and Bear-baiting is completely WP:UNDUE. You have provided no sources whatsoever for any reliable attribution of horse-racing as animal cruelty, much less for this horse in particular. --RexxS (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citing anything PETA says as a reliable source pretty much makes it WP:FRINGE. Also, though the New York Daily News is a tabloid, it is only stating that PETA wanted charges filed, it is not evidence that there was cruelty to this animal. In fact, the drug tests came up clear, there were no pre-existing conditions, and the issue of whether the bloodlines predisposed the horse to injury is fully discussed and cited in the article. Other than the generic claim PETA makes every year around Kentucky Derby season (and the Derby is tomorrow, by the way) that all horse racing is "cruel," there's nothing here. Montanabw ^(talk) 17:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

eight belles and Hillary Clinton

It might be worth noting that the Derby was timed while the Democratic Primary in 2008 was on.

Partisans for Clinton and Obama took to betting on Eight Belles and Big Brown, with even Then Senator Clinton suggesting it at Press Events. The Breakdown of Eight Belles served as a metaphor for her campaign that year.

http://espn.go.com/sports/horse/triplecrown08/news/story?id=3380100

The day began with hope and pomp. Bolstered by the sentimental support from 157,770 fans and endorsed by presidential contender Hillary Clinton and cheered by daughter Chelsea, the filly finished second in the Kentucky Derby on Saturday."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/03/kentucky-derby-horse-eigh_n_99987.html

"“I hope that everybody will go to the derby on Saturday and place just a little money on the filly for me,” Sen. Clinton told supporters in Jeffersonville, Ind., ABC News reports. “I won’t be able to be there this year - my daughter is going to be there and so she has strict instructions to bet on Eight Belles.”

It would be IMHO noteworthy to mention the political tie-in to this article on Eight Belles.

--Patbahn (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It might deserve a sentence or two, but it's not that huge of a deal. Plenty of political events coincide with horse events, and there's no law that says a politician can't like or bet on a particular horse. The breakdown serving as a metaphor for the campaign; you'd have to be careful with that so as to avoid WP:OR. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd be careful too. (Full disclosure: ** I ** bet on Eight Belles!) A brief note of the politicians weighing in, with sources, might be OK. Montanabw ^(talk) 23:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's an interesting piece of trivia, but I'd also urge caution. Once you open the door to including content that is essentially tangential to the article subject, you can expect increasingly tenuous content to be inserted ("Pee Diidy had a hamster called 8-Bellz"). The problem then becomes where do you draw the line and how do you justify it? --RexxS (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was thinking that maybe it would be more appropriate to note it at 2008 Kentucky Derby. Montanabw ^(talk) 04:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]