Jump to content

Talk:Edwin McMillan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEdwin McMillan has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 6, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Edwin McMillan and Glenn T. Seaborg were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1951 for their discovery of the transuranium elements?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 18, 2019, and September 18, 2022.

Untitled

[edit]

I believe the correct name of this man is Edwin Mattison McMillan not Edward. If no-one disagrees I will move this and change the links. Dec 3 2002.

No one has disagreed so at 15.00 today I'll make the move. Dec 12 2002

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Edwin McMillan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 18:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First reading

[edit]

This article reads well. Just a few minor points.

That's all for the moment. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final reading

[edit]
  • I sought advice from FunkMonk on the image and my understanding of his reply is that it is OK to use the image. I find that the article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose quality and structure, is suitably cited to reliable sources, is neutral and is stable. I believe it meets the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edwin McMillan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]