Talk:Eduard Melkus
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Some judgments expressed here seem personal
[edit]The paragraph that begins, "Melkus is not much remembered today ..." speaks of his "continuous, rather distracting, vibrato" and then muses further, "Oddly, he never adapted to methods that have been shown by scholars as more appropriate historically, even more recently. His older recordings are generally dismissed and have not been reissued on CD. It is a pity because, despite his less "authentic" sound, the recordings of the 1965-1971 period reveal in his playing what is lacking in most players today ..." and even though there is a mix of positive and negative that amounts to a certain kind of "balance", it is still subjective talk from a personal, not encyclopedic point of view. No? DSatz (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Some of the judgements are rather subjective.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)