Talk:Edict of Torda/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I'll review this over the next several days. --14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Images
- All are properly licensed and appropriate for the article
- Lede
- Good summary, no changes needed.
- Background
- I would link burghers
- Toward tolerance
- No changes needed, but I would make the word "jizya" appear in the text, not just the link, if I were you. It's nothing to stand in the way of the GA nomination, just my opinion.
- John Sigismund, Dávid and Biandrata
- "denominational flexibility": this is a quote, but it's not clear who said it. A historian? If so, name that person.
- The Edict
- This section is fine, no changes needed
Everything else looks good to me. After these minor issues are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this article. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you four your review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestion. Please let me know if any further action is needed. Borsoka (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Looks great, I'll promote it right away. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you again for the review. I highly appreciate your hard work. Borsoka (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Looks great, I'll promote it right away. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you four your review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestion. Please let me know if any further action is needed. Borsoka (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)