Talk:Eat (restaurant)

Criticism

I've just removed the following entry - "EAT also has a reputation for exploiting its work force and has recently been involved in an has had several incidents logged with the HSE and immigration" as there are no citations and it reads like the work of a disgruntled employee or a rival.Danno uk (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Eat (restaurant). Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EAT. → EAT (restaurant) – The full-stop at the end of the title is a Trademark, and only appears in the logo, not in text or other commentary about the company (see company website and external article for confirmation). Per MOS:TM we should not use the Trademark, but should use the official title. However, as EAT is already a redirect to Eating, we must disambiguate to EAT (restaurant), which would be similar to Subway (restaurant). — Amakuru (talk) 12:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Per MOS general rules the rename should be Eat (restaurant) I would be okay with that rename, but not the proposed change. EAT is a link to a disambiguation page that lists EAT. on it, I see no problem with that, where as Eat redirects to Eating. --UnQuébécois (talk) 18:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support the complete application of WP:MOSTM, i.e. Eat (restaurant) without caps and the fullstop (period). — AjaxSmack 01:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a technical reason why this can't just be done?--UnQuébécois (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Technical? No. However, this move could be controversial so it might be better to wait for the RM process to run its course. — AjaxSmack 03:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I was unsure, as the "correct" move in my opinion would not have been controversial. --UnQuébécois (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Also support moving it to Eat (restaurant) per MOS:TM. Jenks24 (talk) 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to Eat (restaurant). – ukexpat (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Move to Eat (restaurant), per The Independent. Kauffner (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - as nominator I am also perfectly happy for it to be moved to Eat (restaurant) — Amakuru (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.