Talk:East Anglia franchise

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 47, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Separate article

Does this article really need to be separate from Greater Anglia franchise? Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern went through multiple franchise renamings in one article. JaJaWa |talk 15:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree set as redirect to Greater Anglia franchise D47817 (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion

As the East Anglia franchise is exactly the same as the Greater Anglia franchise has been since May 2015, just with a new name, suggest that the latter be merged into this article. Mer70x (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the doubling up of information on each page simply to reduce confusion whilst the two pages remain independent however I agree with your proposal to merge the two. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's certainly a strong case for merger - I'd support a merge into one or the other. There's also a case, in my opinion, to include the word rail in the title - so East Anglia rail franchise for example. This seems to me to be more effective as a title for the article - it's odd that it's not there actually. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Greater Anglia Franchise into East Anglia franchise was completed in April 2016. Wire723 (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Anglia franchise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606094818/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/intercity-west-coast-franchise/franchisebidders.pdf to http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/intercity-west-coast-franchise/franchisebidders.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]