Talk:ETR 240

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ETR 240 → FS Class ETR 240 – Correct name for rolling stock articles FS Italia (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; probably pointless. If there were any sources, it's highly unlikely that they'd favour FS Class ETR 240 over ETR 240, so this proposal fails WP:COMMONNAME. But without sources at all, the article appears to fail the GNG too, which is a more pressing problem. A google search for "FS Class ETR 240" only returns this RM. Searching for "ETR 240" gets more results but it's still dominated by mirrors of wikipedia. We should focus on sourced content, rather than tweaking names to fit some internal wikipedia norm regardless of how things are named in the real world. bobrayner (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.