User talk:FS Italia

Milan suburban railway stations

(scrivo in italiano perchè presumo tu sia italiano) Stai cambiando profondamente tutti gli articoli sulle stazioni di Milano, tra l'altro senza chiedere il parere di nessuno. Credo che molte tue modifiche abbiano peggiorato gli articoli, in particolare quelle che slegano completamente le stazioni dal servizio effettuato: non ha senso cancellare i numeri delle linee S che passano nelle stazioni del passante. Provvederò a reinserirle nei prossimi giorni. Nel frattempo, gradirei un minimo di confronto prima di stravolgere intere classi di articoli a cui io e altri hanno lavorato a lungo. --Ita140188 (talk) 10:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ho visto che hai aggiunto un box per le linee S transitanti nelle varie stazioni, ti ringrazio. La mia era solo una critica al fatto che si fossero cancellate la denominazione delle linee suburbane (il motivo per cui le varie stazioni del passante sono state costruite) e mi sembrava che fosse giusto ci fossero. L'importante è chiarirsi! Ciao! --Ita140188 (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, FS Italia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

A barnstar for you!

	Italian Barnstar of National Merit
	For your efforts to start articles on Italian railway stations and address systematic bias by doing so. Keep it up. One thing though. If you could add an inline source this would be great. Hope you stick around and build coverage of Italian railway stations on here!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La vostra accoglienza! Ciao!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One thing. Can you add a sentence/link in the comunes article like this?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:54, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gazzada-Schianno-Morazzone railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gazzada-Schianno-Morazzone railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazzada-Schianno-Morazzone railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ETR 1000

I don't know why you keep removing references to the Frecciarossa 1000 - it hasn't been built yet, but that is no reason not to include a link - I supplied a link showing that the train is official http://www.fsnews.it/cms/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=580eab8c0ef98310VgnVCM1000008916f90aRCRD Oranjblud (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit tendentiously

it's an officially confirmed product, with a signed contract, with press releases on Trenitalia;s own web page, and other reliable sources, with the prime minister of Italy decided to attend the launch.

Yet according to you "it does exist" - please read WP:VERIFY. Just stop - you aren't making any sense, and your removal isn't helpful.Oranjblud (talk) 23:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

I have reported you at the administrators noticeboard for tendentious editing.

The link you keep removing is clearly referenced, and relavent to the navbox - see Wikipedia:Navigation templates

An article about a new train is clearly a relavent link in a navbox about trains of that company. You haven't responded to my messages, or to the links and explanations I have given in my edit summaries.Oranjblud (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FS Italia. I am Dianna and I am an administrator on this wiki. I have had a look at your recent edit war with Oranjblud and I have to agree with him that reverting this addition to the navigation template with an edit summary that "it doesn't exist" doesn't make much sense. We have lots of articles here on Wikipedia about things that may be built someday, things that are in the planning stages, and things that never got off the drawing board. Just because no real-world examples of the train yet exist is no reason not to include a link to our article on the subject on the template. Might I suggest that you try communicating on the talk page (even templates have a talk page) rather than via edit summaries? Communicating solely through edit summaries almost always leads to edit wars. -- Dianna (talk) 18:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have now requested full protection for the template. You need to engage in discussion on the talk page. Frietjes (talk) 21:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Template:FS EMUs and DMUs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Electric Catfish 22:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of railway stations in Lombardy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Naples Metro reverts

Hello FS Italia,
I noted a bit of edit warring with IP 87.17.155.199 (talk · contribs) at Naples Metro and Naples–Aversa railway. Rather than just revert what appear to me to be good faith (but perhaps un-constructive) edits, perhaps it would have been better to drop a note on the editors talk page. Just a suggestion.

I have now welcomed them and given them a gentle template warning ({{template:uw-ewsoft}}) about edit warring. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 02:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but take a look on those articles...--FS Italia (talk) 02:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had a quick look while seeing what the reverts were all about, is there something in particular I need to look at? I note you have created a lot of new pages (≈83) on Italian train stations. Keep up the good work!

220 of ^Borg 03:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about Naples Metro and Naples–Aversa railway, I've put some references in them that were removed by the IP...--FS Italia (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treno Servizio Regionale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Servizio metropolitano bolognese

Ciao, ti scrivo in italiano, perchè presumo tu sia italiano. Sicuramente il servizio metropolitano di Bologna è in fase di completamento, ma al momento è funzionante al 70%, quindi merita di essere menzionato, anche perchè se funzionante al 70% (quasi completo) è di certo un servizio migliore e più importante di alcuni riportati in lista. Io me ne servo spesso, e quindi ti posso assicurare che con l'apertura della nuova stazione AV, anche se sulla carta risulta ancora leggermente incompleto, il servizio metropolitano di Bologna Esiste eccome. Saluti 151.41.251.204 (talk) 16:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

L'ho rimosso perché non mi pare che sia stato formalmente istituito, ovvero che i treni non riportino la categoria S, che manchino ancora le mappe nelle stazioni, eccetera. Poi so che l'offerta esiste ed è buona, almeno su alcune linee, ma in questi elenchi si guarda la forma, e non la sostanza, altrimenti ognuno metterebbe ciò che gli pare...--FS Italia (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ho reinserito anche perchè non è una questione personale, ma ti posso garantire che il servizio, come si evince dal sito ufficiale è entrato in funzione ufficialmente con l'apertura della nuova stazione AV. Naturalmente è da perfezionare, ma merita assolutamente di essere citato. Saluti151.41.251.204 (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ti consiglierei di consultare il progetto trasporti su it.wiki per avere un parere più articolato; per loro il sistema risulta ancora in corso di attuazione. D'altra parte consultando il nuovo orario Trenitalia risulta chiaramente che le linee Modena-Bologna e Bologna-Imola non esistono ancora, mentre le altre hanno ancora frequenze irregolari. Rimuovo fino a che la questione non sarà chiarita.--FS Italia (talk) 12:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sicuramente è in via di attuazione per il 20% rimanente, ma se vogliamo paragonare le caratteristiche dei servizi metropolitani delle città italiane in lista, rispondenti a quello che elenchi nel tuo primo intervento, mappe, categoria S, ecc. nessune di queste è in linea con le caratteristiche richieste, eccetto Milano e forse Torino. Comunque, insisto nel confermare le fonti, che sono invece di diverso parere e che affermano che il servizio è iniziato al 70% in giugno 2013. Se mi puoi fontare la discussione su progetto trasporti su it.wiki, perche io non l'ho trovata.151.41.175.93 (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, non vogliamo e non possiamo fare paragoni, visto che questa è un'enciclopedia, e quindi le nostre opinioni sono irrilevanti.

Su it.wiki non c'è ancora una discussione, ma il sistema è tuttora riportato come "un progetto" ([1]); se apri una discussione, sentirai il parere di altri, in particolare l'utente Lucaf1 che si interessa di questi aspetti.--FS Italia (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Su (it.wiki) il sistema è riportato come progetto, perchè è stato attuato al 70% e viene specificato benissimo lo stato di attuazione da Lucaf1. Quindi per il momento se a te va bene io la chiuderei qui, anche se sarebbe corretto specificare la gestione TPER - Trenitalia che hai tolto, che è attualmente in corso e fontata nel sito ufficiale.151.41.175.93 (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ho tolto i gestori, perché nella tabella non vanno messi (dice "Official link", non "Operators"!). Comunque sono correttamente riportati nell'infobox della voce dedicata al SFM.--FS Italia (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[2] - any idea what an "anti-south" is? :D Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It means that I have prejudices against southern Italy. It's quite calumnious...--FS Italia (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin or anything, I was just curious. :) I guess most countries have North/South divides then! :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care: I'm adding information about a metro line in southern Italy, I wouldn't do so if I had some prejudices...--FS Italia (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Line Naples-Giugliano-Aversa

Hello FS Italia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Line Naples-Giugliano-Aversa, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it can be left, but we should take care about vandalisms on that page.--FS Italia (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Porto Ceresio–Milan railway) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Porto Ceresio–Milan railway, FS Italia!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATM Class 1500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansaldo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arona–Novara railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arona

FS Class ALe 724 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chopper

Varallo–Novara railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Varallo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

line Luino - Oleggio

Excuse me, I don't speak English very well, i'm Italian!

Volevo dirti che la pagina che hai appena modificato presenta alcuni errori, perchè la linea arriva fino a Pino per poi entrare in Svizzera, dove ha capolinea a Bellinzona. Dall'altra parte termina a Somma Lombardo per poi intrecciarsi sulla linea Milano-Gallarate-Novara. Grazie. --87.8.30.67 (talk) 10:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La linea è definita come "Luino-Oleggio" dall'operatore (RFI); la tratta da Luino a Pino è parte della rete delle Ferrovie Federali Svizzere, mentre Somma Lombardo non c'entra proprio niente, né esiste una linea Milano-Gallarate-Novara...--FS Italia (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anzi.. A dire il vero la linea è Milano-Gallarate-Domodossola, dove poi nei dintorni di Arona c'è lo svincolo per Oleggio e Novara, dove incontra la linea della FNM Saronno-Busto nord-Malpensa-Novara. Aggiungo infine che ho sbagliato, perchè non è a Somma l'intreccio, ma a Sesto Calende--79.37.187.1 (talk) 18:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chivasso–Alessandria railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sassari Metro-tramway

Hello, I'm Felisopus. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Sassari Metro-tramway. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. There's no consensus about your edits and you can't delete refs. Stop immediately. --Felisopus (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marseille–Ventimiglia railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Railway lines in Liguria]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know

It would be nice if you actually explained why you reverted and also inform him of WP:3RR. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 15:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to discuss anymore with that user. I've been insulted by him several times, sorry--FS Italia (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nocera Inferiore–Mercato San Severino railway diagram

Template:Nocera Inferiore–Mercato San Severino railway diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wind of freedom (talk) 00:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Genoa urban railway service

The article Genoa urban railway service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This service has never existed. The article is about regional train services which stops at all stations in the city of Genoa. Nobody talks about an urban rail service, in fact there are no sources about that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wind of freedom (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Varallo–Novara railway diagram

Template:Varallo–Novara railway diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Arona–Novara railway diagram

Template:Arona–Novara railway diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rete celere del Canton Ticino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rete celere del Canton Ticino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rete celere del Canton Ticino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mackensen (talk) 16:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FL color

Template:FL color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MSR color

Template:MSR color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lecco–Brescia railway diagram

Template:Lecco–Brescia railway diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]