Talk:ESSEC Business School

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Untitled

i am interested in becoing one of your sudents, i would like to have your brochure.i am in urgent need of that.thanks waiting for reply john obi

I am sorry this isn't quite the place to ask for such a thing. You can get an Executive MBA application brochure [here], and a full-time MBA one [here]. Rdavout 16:38, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking sources

In the introduction, the claim is made that ESSEC is one of the two leading business schools in France. According to whom, the author of this article? I guess HEC is the the other one, but I've seen rankings where EM-Lyon and/or ESCP-EAP have been ranked above ESSEC. If the article is going to be categorical about ESSEC being one of the two leading business schools in France some very good sources will be needed. Just finding one ranking that claims it isn't really enough as long as other rankings disagree. Another problem is that a number of rankings, both domestic and international, are given in the article but with no source provided. For all major universities and business schools I've seen on Wikipedia, such rankings are sourced by inserting the link to the rank. That hasn't been done here, so the rankings must stand as unsourced for now. JdeJ 17:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ESSEC Business School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ESSEC Business School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content, overall quality

I think the whole page needs revision. The amount of promotional content is extremely heavy. Also, the history section is written in very bad English, obviously by a non-native speaker. It would be better to delete 90% of the chapter than keeping it this way. Warlock96 (talk) 13:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Warlock96, this is a horrible article in barely readable English. I also think deleting 90% of it would be better than leaving it as it is.Jeppiz (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Deletion of the controversies paragraph. This is an inappropriate content, sources are gossip articles. Plus defamation of a student by giving her name which is against the rules of wikipedia. Oddly, Otterslort just made some bogus changes before adding this paragraph, clearly to defame. 93.31.62.78 (talk) 23:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - The Controversies section should be removed on the following grounds: 1. it identifies the student by name, which can lead to unsavory repercussions, 2. it seems a rather isolated incident that doesn't actually have much to do with the school, except for the fact that this person goes there, 3. it's not really that notable. The person who caused the incident is definetly not notable and Wikipedia is not a repository of every single stupid and racist thing anybody has ever done. PraiseVivec (talk) 14:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already done – robertsky (talk) 12:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rankings: Sources Added

Relevant sources have been added for the rankings section. The only thing that remains an issue with the page is the 'History' section. The information is quite useful, although it is poorly structured with incorrect grammar. I will be fixing it in a couple of days. If there are any other issues, do let me know and we could try to rectifying it too.

JohnDiop (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC) JohnDip[reply]

Alumni list

Hi Jeppiz, while I agree on the inconsistency, the guideline per WP:ALUMNI indicate the listing requires a reference for it. As some of the listing may have predated the guideline, the general sentiment is that whatever is on the listing, stays there and not removed. However if any editors were to remove them, they can remove them anytime, similar to unsourced statements. Any new insertion of alumni is subjected to WP:ALUMNI when added in. Feel free to remove the previous listing (for those without a reference) or insert a reference link from their pages to here. Thanks --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]