Talk:EOC 10 inch 40 caliber

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / Italian / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

Article name

The article name seems to follow Japanese Navy convention, however was installed aldo in Italian and Argentine ships in greater numbers. Should it be renamed following a more generic denomination, and then navy-specific names redirecting to it? Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The obvious alternative name would be derived from its caliber length and I think that it's probable that this was not the only 10-inch gun of that caliber length built. So I think that the best thing to do is to leave this article alone and redirect the Italian and Argentinian usages here. If you can discover the formal names used by them, which I've found can be surprisingly hard to do.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]