Talk:Dux de Lux

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand music task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Dux de Lux appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the bar and restaurant Dux de Lux was once the home of zoologist Charles Chilton?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/June.

Wikipedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dux de Lux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article scope

It seems time to review what exactly the scope of this article is. From the lead, it seems to be about the restaurant, but much of the content is about the building. The sources are mixed, but don't seem to establish notability for the restaurant alone, and seeing that the restaurant has moved (closed?), that seems unlikely to change. Before making changes—or even considering deletion—I just wanted to get input, hopefully from locals. — HTGS (talk) 00:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HTGS: I wrote the article just after the earthquakes in a quest to document heritage buildings threatened by demolition. It’s still standing but still closed, and as far as I know, it hasn’t been repaired. The owner of the restaurant is notable and the Dux as a restaurant is also notable (they did the most meals of any restaurant in Christchurch), but much more so as a music venue. The Dux as an institution has diversified; they have a pub in the Central City and their restaurant is in Riccarton (its second post-EQ location). Schwede 66 01:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, in your opinion, should the article favour the building over the restaurant? I have no objection to splitting into two articles, but the current article—since the restaurant/company has moved—reads like it is attempting to cover what appear to be two distinct topics. If the building were the main focus, for instance, I would probably rewrite and expand only the lead sentence. — HTGS (talk) 01:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind. Anybody can come along and develop the restaurant part as a stand-alone article. As long as the new article demonstrates that notability criteria are met, that would be a great improvement. Schwede 66 20:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]