Talk:Dutton/Dunwich

Canada: Ontario / Geography / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dutton/Dunwich, Ontario → Dutton/Dunwich –

No need for disambiguation. Unique name. P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contesting - aren't all locales disambiguated regardless of the need? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Far from it. Do a quick search and you'll see that is not the case. Also see WP:CANSTYLE. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I support the removal of "Onatario" per WP:CANSTYLE, but why does the article use a slash? Just having a quick search, most of the sources I found used "Dutton-Dunwich". Jenks24 (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm seeing the slash, at least here [1]. --Born2cycle (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Both the municipality itself and Statistics Canada use the slash. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fair enough, moving to full support. Jenks24 (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Remove unnecessary disambiguation. --Born2cycle (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the current name is not a disambiguation, it's a placename, statename type of name. HandsomeFella (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is disambiguation for a Canadian place, where standard practice is to just use the placename as long as it's unambiguous. Jenks24 (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.