Talk:Duqu

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

This article is really easy to read, as an individual who knows nothing about computer science. Thanks for making it that way! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.171.233.71 (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More Sources

Copy from article. I decided to move here

Additional up-to-date references include technical reports, blog posts, articles, tools, etc. are also available on the SCADAhacker website at this link. This website is maintained by a group of professionals focused on cyber security as it relates to industrial control systems (aka SCADA) and how they are used to command and control critical infrastructure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonvallite (talk • contribs) 02:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction recommended to the article lead

The hungarians did not discover the threat per se, but they were the first to disclose meaningful info about it. The iranians were already complaining during the spring that they had found a new "amero-zionist threat containing star imagery". Nobody took them full seriously, because iranians held the samples to themselves and analyzed them in secret. Then crss.hu came forward and the galaxy clash photo hidden within the Duqu net comms became widely known. 82.131.210.163 (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strange statements, but if you actually have any reliable source to back that up, a change could be considered. Otherwise, please avoid using WP as a forum. See WP:TPG. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duqu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6B98SI8gJ?url=http://www.crysys.hu/in-the-press.html to http://www.crysys.hu/in-the-press.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]