Talk:Dunedin East

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Establishment year for Dunedin East

There's been some confusion about the establishment year for this electorate. This has been discussed on an editor's talk page and on an article talk page. Here's a synopsis and my findings:

Scholefield, Guy (1925) [First ed. published 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record (3rd ed.). Wellington: Govt. Printer. p. 137. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) lists Robert Stout as having represented the City of Dunedin electorate in 1875–79 (resigned on 23 June 1879) in the entry for his name. There is no list of members by electorate in that edition.
Scholefield, Guy (1950) [First ed. published 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record, 1840–1949 (3rd ed.). Wellington: Govt. Printer. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) lists Stout as having represented Dunedin East in 1875–79 (page 157) and the entry for his name (page 141; same resignation date).
Wilson, James Oakley (1985) [First ed. published 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record, 1840–1984 (4th ed.). Wellington: V.R. Ward, Govt. Printer. OCLC 154283103. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) also shows Stout as Dunedin East (page 262 is visible in Google books).
For Dec 1875 to Jan 1876, searching for "Dunedin East" or "Dunedin City East" returns nil results in Papers Past.
Stout was nominated for Dunedin together with the other winners for that electorate, which can be seen in the Evening Post, Grey River Argus, Thames Star and other newspapers. The election was held on Monday, 20 December 1875.
The results for Dunedin were reported in many newspapers and align with the list of candidates from the nomination, e.g. North Otago Times, Thames Star and Evening Post. Stout is reported to have won in the three-member City of Dunedin electorate.
And here is one of many examples, this from the North Otago Times, of a results list.
Stout resigned on 23 June 1875 and William Downie Stewart Sr was elected in his place. Searching Papers Past with the search words "stewart dunedin election" returns 49 results.
Adding "east" to the previous search term returns 2 results, but again no mention of an electorate called Dunedin East.
Downie Stewart succeeded Stout, and Stewart is in all versions of the New Zealand Parliamentary Record recorded as having represented City of Dunedin.

I conclude that the Dunedin East electorate did not exist in 1875 for the general election, or in 1879 for the by-election. Sometime between 1925 and 1950, an error has crept into the official government publication, the New Zealand Parliamentary Record. Robert Stout was elected for City of Dunedin in 1875, and not for Dunedin East. Schwede 66 08:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]