Jump to content

Talk:Dudley Canal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lapal vs Lappal

[edit]

The modern spelling has one p. That is the place name on current maps, and also of the Lapal Canal Trust. If the spelling Lappal is preferred in the canal world, please comment.  :) Oosoom Talk to me 09:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also aware of the conundrum. As you point out the place, Lapel, has one p and that occurs in both the one-inch map of Great Britain, Sheet 131, revised 1958-59, the 1:50000 First Series, revised 1972, as well as more recent OS Maps. I've always known the tunnel spell with two ps; and that convention was used by Charles Hatfield in Canals of the West Midlands, 1966. There is no reason why the tunnel and the place cannot have different spellings. All the references in this Dudley Canal article were to Lappal Tunnel, but a stub Lapal Tunnel has been recently created and the references changed to Lapal Tunnel. The way around the difficulty is to keep the present Lapal Tunnel article and to create a Redirect page Lappal Tunnel for those of use that expect to find it spelt with two ps. Pyrotec 17:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Mapping details

[edit]

Does anyone know what the line from Tipton Jn over the Netherton Tunnel Branch is called? Also, I am not sure about the branch labelled Pensnett. My maps show if on that side, but the mention of the Grazebrook Arm leaving to the south east would seem to point to a different name and the opposite side of the canal. Help needed, please. Bob1960evens 21:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a minor problem with the map: The two Dudley tunnels are not on the same contour. Dudley Tunnel is on the 473 ft level and that is what goes over the top of the Netherton Tunnel Branch. Netherton Tunnel is on the 453 ft level. See pages 66 & 67 of Hadfield (1966), Canals of the West Midlands, 1st ed. There are two branches at Parkhead: Grazebrook arm is on the east and Pensnett on the west, above the locks. (see Hadfield, page 254).Pyrotec 13:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Corrections done. I think it is correct now.Pyrotec 19:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]
  • Suitably referenced, with inline citations
  • Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
  • Defined structure, with adequate lead
  • Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
  • Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
  • Appropriately understandable

Based on these criteria, I am rating this B. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dudley Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dudley Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dudley Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

I wince every time see this very old photo, featuring dumped furniture and someone walking out of shot. The walkable section actually continues a further kilometre south and there is a good photo available on Geograph that well illustrates the current state of the southern end of the canal. I don't have any experience of using Geograph pics and I couldn't find this file already existing on Commons, though it is licensed for reuse under CC. Does someone know how to do this please? Shantavira|feed me 10:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dudley_Canal&oldid=1207048793"