Jump to content

Talk:Drepanophycus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger

[edit]

I copied relevant material from an article on Drepanophycus spinaeformis, which was then a stub, and left it as a redirect. (There are no other species articles.)

  • For extinct plants, we generally only have a genus article with brief discussions of the species.
  • There is rarely enough material which is relevant to Wikipedia for a species article on an extinct plant (specialists will read the original literature); this was true of the Drepanophycus spinaeformis article which was labelled a stub.

The article needs more work, e.g. on the phylogeny of the genus and on at least some of the other species.
(There are also issues over the Drepanophycaceae article, which (a) has little material (b) describes a rather out of date taxonomic situation.) Peter coxhead (talk) 14:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drepanophycus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]