Talk:Draycot, Oxfordshire

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 November 2022 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

On 20 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Draycott, Oxfordshire to Draycot, Oxfordshire. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 20 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that the proposed spelling, "Draycot", is the WP:COMMONNAME among the most trustworthy sources. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draycott, Oxfordshire → Draycot, Oxfordshire – Spelling corrected 2A00:23EE:1708:FB15:88C4:6301:6CE9:E914 (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 2A00:23EE:1708:FB15:88C4:6301:6CE9:E914 (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking "Draycot, Oxfordshire" up on Google, and it seems to show "Draycott, Oxfordshire", so moving it might be violating WP:COMMONNAME. I've created a redirect, but tell me if I'm wrong and why we should move it if we should. ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 21:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The correct spelling is with one t. This is what is said on all Ordnance Survey maps of the area and on the minutes of the local parish council and neighbourhood plan:

https://www.southoxon.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/09/Tidding-with-Albury-Neighbourhood-Plan.pdf

Tiddington-with-Albury-Neighbourhood-Development-Plan-Examiners-report.pdf (southoxon.gov.uk)

It also appears on Google Maps with one t.

The Wikipedia page was clearly mis-spelled when it was created and correcting it will help to prevent future mis-spellings.

Please make the correctly spelled page with one T the main page and the page with two Ts can be the redirect. 82.1.185.137 (talk) 09:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Both names seem to be used. It's so insignificant that it doesn't even appear to have any road signs pointing to it, so we can't even go by those. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the Ordnance Survey (though it doesn't appear in the database under either Geograph OS maps show it with just 1 t) and Google Maps use just 1 "t". Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Ordnance Survey and Google Maps have it as one T, as do the local council records listed above. There are also two signs in the village if you "walk" through on Google Streetview which use one T. There appears to be some historic use of two Ts. 185.104.136.51 (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are there? I couldn't find them. Could you post a link to the Streetview. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (weakly): Victoria County History (1962) for the nearby parish of Waterstock has "Draycott village", with double t.[1] Not in itself a justification to deny the proposed change.--AntientNestor (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per WP:COMMONAME. It is likely that the name of a place may be mis-spelled but that does not mean we should not use the most common correct spelling. The Google results are the results of errors on Wikipedia propagating across the internet (one reason why poorly-written geostubs are bad). The one "t" spelling is also recommended by WP:CRITERIA since it is more accurate and more concise. FOARP (talk) 10:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.