Talk:Drax the Destroyer

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hulk#Merged Hulk/The Professor|Hulk]] The anchor (#Merged Hulk/The Professor) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Skullcap

he always wears a purple skullcap; it has been suggested that the skullcap is non-removable

i could be mistaken, but it appears that in the recently released 1st issue of the new Drax mini-series, the big man is sans skullcap, sporting simply a bald green head.12.47.223.8 21:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Isn't there a Starlin picture we could use to show his original appearance ? -- Beardo 16:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drax's Powers and abilities: Erroneous Posting??

There is a paragraph in the "Powers and Abilities" section whereby the poster claims that Drax can rip apart planets.

I don't EVER remember Drax having that kind of power in any of his incarnations. Did these events ever actually happen with Drax...and more importantly, did he perform these feats with the aid of the Power Gem??

In Iron Man #55 which was his first appearance he and Thanos destroyed a planet by fighting on it. No power gem involved.

Please respond, as I wish to alter the entry in the near future to both correct the error, if it is indeed one, and to update the entry. Thanos777 16:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drax was recently in the Legion of Super Heroes (animated series), but Legion of Superheroes is DC Comics, and Drax is from Marvel. Brigid 18:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being sort of a geek about character strength levels I remember very specifically in an issue of "Infinity Watch" or whatever it was called, that Drax was tested, and WITH the aid of the power gem had strength that was comparable to the Hulk. The Hulk is very consistently regarded as the strongest of humanoid creature in the Marvel Universe. The only character I recall ever being definitively stronger was the original Abomination. (Samu0034 03:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DRAX004cov col.jpg

Image:DRAX004cov col.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Drax.PNG

Image:Drax.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avengers Assemble

Yes, the book stars the cast of the movie, but no, it is not movie continuity. See Iron Man's armor, the ultimate nullifier, the mentions of past history between the Avengers and the Guardians, the cosmic cube not being called a "Tesseract", or just about any of the content. Shoot, look at the logo on the cover. It's the comic logo, not the movie logo, which was used on movie continuity comics like Fury's Big Week, or the Black Widow mini.

To boot, the solicit for #8, the final issue, mentions it's setting up events for the new Avengers series starting in November.

If you have any source, or even just a reason, to believe AA is movie continuity, please provide it. Otherwise, please stop removing sourced info from the various pages. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It cant be in the 616 continuity either so I just assume it was from the movie world. --98.216.246.173 (talk) 17:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't it be in 616? Terrible writing aside, the characters are all in current 616 uniforms, and there are numerous references to other 616 events, like the Ultimate Nullifier or Avengers Mansion being repeatedly destroyed. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

some of the members they are using are dead plus thanos, and some members that was last seen on the team are not on the team. I dont know about Star Lord's uniform isn't he suppose to wear a mask? Also the Avengers I think act more like from the movie. --98.216.246.173 (talk) 23:45, 16 August 2012

No, some of the members just haven't explained how they came back. ;) The roster change I chalk up to Rocket gathering those he could find after Annihilators: Earthfall. The acting, well, Bendis is doing a terrible job writing. Issue 9 has been confirmed as part of Marvel NOW!, so that should dispel any doubt about it being in 616. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction...

Having just read the entry on Drax's history, it says in one section that his mind was restored at Moondragon's request 1996, then in another that it happened when his body was remade in 2006. Which is it? Or did the 2006 author just not know about the previous story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loomborn (talk • contribs) 14:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's both. The 1996 story had poor sales, so relatively few people knew his mind restored. The writer of the 2006 story (and the book's editor) may have been unaware of the event, or they may have decided to ignore it since it wasn't done very well anyway. It's also possible Drax was re-damaged in some untold event. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

any inspiration from the 1940s character?

I've been reading the original Jim Starlin issues of Iron Man and Captain Marvel that introduced this character: his original costume looked very familiar, and I realised it is almost identical to the Golden Age Destroyer ... compare the covers of Mystic 6 with Captain Marvel 58, in these pages ... also the other characters hardly ever call him Drax, just "The Destroyer"

I don't know about Starlin, but Roy Thomas was the editor for all these issues, and he of course created the (Silver Age) Vision, inspired by the Golden Age Vision, and was generally obsessed with reviving Golden Age characters...

have either Thomas or Starlin ever commented on any intention to make Drax a modern update of the Golden Age character?

J Edward Malone (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roy's introduction to the Captain Marvel masterworks discusses the origins of Thanos in detail, but I don't recall any mention of Drax. This indicates Starlin was designing the character prior to working for Marvel. I always thought he looked similar to Phantom. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the two destroyers are obviously versions of the same character. Identical looks and costumes (the skull brooch in particular is revealing); both have been part of the Guardians of the Galaxy. I think the pages should be merged. Or at least, they should mention the existence of each other. Nicolas Le Novère (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The name "Arthur Douglas" combines the first names oF Douglas Adams and his main character, Arthur Dent.

This is just coincidence - Drax the Destroyer appeared five years before Douglas Adams started HHGG Argento Surfer (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]