Talk:Drapers' Gardens

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Drapers' Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Drapers' Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riskybuildings.org.uk/docs/03drapers/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090103014956/http://www.pre-construct.com/Sites/Highlights/Drapers.htm to http://www.pre-construct.com/Sites/Highlights/Drapers.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riskybuildings.org.uk/docs/03drapers/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata item split into two

I've split the Drapers' Gardens Wikidata item into two, because the existing item was a mishmash of facts about two different things: the Drapers' Gardens tower designed by Seifert and built in the sixties, and the Drapers' Gardens office block designed by Foggo Associates and built in 2009. Here is the item specific to the 2009 building.

This Wikipedia article covers Drapers' Gardens as an area, covering the history of the area and the two different office developments built on it. At the moment, its "Wikidata item" link refers to the Seifert tower.

It might be better to split this Wikipedia article into three: one for the area and its history; one for the Seifert tower; and one for the modern office block. Alternatively, create a Wikidata entry which represents the Drapers' Gardens area, rather than a specific building, and have this Wikipedia article refer to that. --Bob (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've now posted this question in the Interwiki conflicts page, because I think that's probably the more appropriate place for this sort of discussion. Please post any thoughts on that page, and ignore this entry here on the Drapers' Gardens talk page. --Bob (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]