Jump to content

Talk:Drache-class ironclad/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Section 1; sentence 1; "...launch of the French Gloire, the first ironclad warship", first ironclad of the world or Europe or France, mention that clearly.
    • Done
  • Section 1; Better mention who is "Kaiser Franz Josef I", something like "Emperor of Austria" etc.
    • Added
  • Section 1.1; para 1; beam measured 13.94 meters (45 ft 9 in); but in the infobox it is 14 m (45 ft 11 in)
    • A legacy of when the article was based on Silverstone's less precise work - good catch.
  • Section 1.1; para 1; they displaced 2,824 long tons (2,869 t) at normal load, and 3,110 long tons (3,160 t) at deep load; but in the infobox it is 2,779 long tons (2,824 t)
    • Probably the same as above
  • Is it possible to add the information about the later guns that were installed in 1867, in the infobox.
    • Added
  • Section 1.14; para 3; The frigates broadside ironclads; this looks a bit confusing. I think it is to "The frigates were broadside ironclads".
    • Yeah, the "were" was missing.
  • All the three images lack dates on their description pages. Please add approx. dates as I suggested on Talk:Kaiser Max-class ironclad (1862)/GA1.
    • Added to all three
  • Better to link "Prussia" and "Italy" on their first mention.
    • Linked Prussia, but Italy is already linked in the design section.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]