Talk:Drabant Corps of Charles XII

Military history: European / Nordic / Early Modern Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Caroleans#Formations and tactics|Swedish cavalry regulation]] The anchor (#Formations and tactics) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Improving the article

It's my intention to improve this article and have a look at the issues, displayed in the tags, as soon as I come back from the small break I'm having from Wikipedia. Obviously, I will need help with copyediting; I might ask for that help later. Before that, however, I want to fix the most serious issue in my opinion: The "factual accuracy is disputed." tag; I've asked user Tamingimpala what makes its accuracy disputed, so that I can fix it ASAP, and I'm waiting for an answer. I will trim the lead once I get back from my break. As far as section headers are concerned, I'd like advice here - how do I make the article more navigable (e.g., is it better to have the battles under each campaign they were fought [as it is now], or should battles and campaigns be divided into their own section headers?) Imonoz (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a driveby comment, this article seems excessively detailed given its size and period of service. It could do with some trimming. Zawed (talk) 08:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

if you have too many headers you eventually run into problems. I have been swooping in and out out of the article on copy-edit forays because nobody else seemed to be working on it. However, it’s pretty far from my usual topic areas and therefore slow going to decipher it, so I encourage anyone interested to work on it. One small comment is that this sort of article typically has a lot of flowery language brought in from sources, which impedes readability and probably should be the first place to look for cuts. But hey, if you guys want to work on it, I am not going to micromanage how Elinruby (talk)