Talk:Doxastic attitudes

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Definition

This page needs to define the word, not say what can be applied to it (defining that only by way of a wikilink). Starting the sentence with the subject would be a start. Good luck! NickelShoe (Talk) 15:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. It's circular! and I haven't found a good definition anywhere. Is this even a common term? Can we justify its usage? Bordello 13:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidentialism?

I'm not sure why there are substantive philosophical theses—uncited—that are being asserted on this page. They are misleading and pretty outlandish. In particular, I don't know why action is necessarily linked to doxastic attitudes. Don't do philosophy on Wikipedia, explain philosophy on Wikipedia! R. Brian Tracz (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]