Talk:Downtown Community House

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Close paraphrasing/plagiarism

A great deal of this article has been copied from http://savewashingtonstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/105-107-and-109-Report-Save-Washington-Street.pdf, and I don't see any free use license which would permit that. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this, too, but the original creating edit summary said, "Adapted from Report by Kate Reggev, Entered into CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL by Save Washington Street" so we probably need to get a OTRS email to confirm that. I guess. I've never dealt with this sort of thing before. I just came across this while trying out Page Curation. —Cupco 02:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Left OTRS instructions at User talk:Tfine80#Downtown Community House. —Cupco 02:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh there it is. Yes, I missed that. The user makes the same assertion at the Commons for her photos. I'm removing the tag per AGF, I'm confident she is who she claims she is, and while some more formal process may need to take place, this isn't the egregious case of plagiarism I took it to be, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I commissioned the report and have released it. The author of the report is also aware. Tfine80 (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downtown Community House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009010708/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20110610/downtown/downtown-preservationists-fight-save-1920s-community-center to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20110610/downtown/downtown-preservationists-fight-save-1920s-community-center

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]