Talk:Double-mindedness

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Informative or Persuasive?

If this article is meant to be informative, its value is lost on me, as the page is full of questions being asked rather than information being conveyed to the reader. While I consider myself fairly open-minded (and quite passionately so, at times P:D ), this seems more like a sermon or proselyzation than a WP article.

If this article is meant to persuade, than it isn't meant to be a WP article. It would be better included in a personal Wikia, such as my own Wikia is set up, where original research, personal opinion, and attempts to persuade others are at least more tolerable. I commend the author(s?) on their industriousness, but this is the wrong place for their work, despite whatever other virtues it exhibits. How does the rest of the WP community feel about this? -- TheLastWordSword (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]