Jump to content

Talk:Doris Stevens/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Lede
  • "organizer. She was in charge of organizing the women's congress, held at the Panama Pacific Exposition in 1915. When the CUWS became the National Woman's Party (NWP) in 1916, Stevens organized" -Can you find a way to reword "organizr/img/ed to avoud rep?
 Done Not really anything in thesaurus, I guess a labor organizer/union organizer is just that, but I called her a "national strategist" which to my thinking is what she did. SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jailed for Freedom -year in brackets?
 Done SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Early life
  • Link Omaha?
 Done SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Suffrage
  • Palace Hotel, in San Francisco.
 Done SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Equality
  • "Stevens served as vice chairman of NWP’s New York branch,[4] spearheaded the NWP Women for Congress campaign in 1924. " did you mean to add an and before "spearheaded"?
 Done, no, I actually meant spearheading. Fixed it.SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • League of Nations should be linked in the first instance and delinked elsewhere (at the bottom).
 Done SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Later career
  • "From 1951 to 1963, " -new paragraph needed
 Done SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderfully comprehensive and well written. Can find little wrong with it, great job SusunW, Megalibrarygirl and RosiestepDr. Blofeld 12:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Blofeld you rock! Thank you so much. Coming from you, that is high praise indeed. We worked hard on her. SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: