Talk:Donald Cousens Parkway

Donald Cousens Parkway has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Low‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, add |needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Donald Cousens Parkway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
"A two-laned Ninth Line curves northeast after crossing and being crossed by railway tracks and becomes Donald Cousens Parkway", should indicate that these are separate railroad tracks. You should also add the name of the railroads operating the lines.

"On the east side is a new residential subdivision, while the west side beyond the Canadian Pacific (CP) Havelock tracks, which the road parallels, is the completely undeveloped Bob Hunter Memorial Park", you flipped the directions as the homes are to the west and the park to the east.

The sentence "However, although a short portion between Copper Creek Drive and Highway 407, including the unfinished ramps at the interchange, was opened by 2011,[19] the remainder of the project was delayed by issues involving the new railway crossing along 14th Avenue." sounds confusing and needs to be reworded.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Reference 5 is missing a title.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
"It passes a Walmart and then interchanges with Highway 407, crossing over the toll route", you should not mention specific store names. You should use a more general term like "businesses". Also you should not use interchange as a verb.

Is the "tenth line" supposed to be the straight road parallel to the parkway north of the Highway 7 junction? If so, you need to be consistent with capitalization and the road also does not look "unimproved" to me.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes made. I've tried asking two people on flickr for the use of their photographs, but haven't received a response after two weeks. I have photos myself, but alas, they are on my broken hard drive :/ In time. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 21:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After an additional fix I made myself, I will pass the article. Dough4872 23:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donald Cousens Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319232406/http://www.dcptomorningsidelink.ca/pdf/Final%20EA%20Report/5016%20EA%20Report%20Amendment%20CHAPTER%204%20%20Jul%202011.pdf to http://www.dcptomorningsidelink.ca/pdf/Final%20EA%20Report/5016%20EA%20Report%20Amendment%20CHAPTER%204%20%20Jul%202011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Donald Cousens Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]