Talk:Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 13, 2017. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move back to lowercase til
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough → Don't Stop 'til You Get Enough – The move that previously capitalized 'Til was ill-motivated, saying "The form with the capital seems to be more usual, & appears on publicity material." The former does not appear to be true, and neither is relevant, per MOS:CAPS, MOS:TM, and especially MOS:CT. Dicklyon (talk) 21:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Mild support; looks weird capitalized. Red Slash 23:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support, although nom has wrong reasons to move. MOSTM doesn't apply and even though "until"/"til" is a preposition and CT applies, WP:COMMONAME may be a stronger argument like in Star Trek Into Darkness. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- COMMONNAME cannot override our manual of style, not least because they address different topics. COMMONNAME is how we decide what the title should be, and our MOS tells us how we render that title. COMMONNAME has nothing to say on matters of style. Powers T 18:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Then if "into" is a four letters preposition, why Star Trek Into Darkness is not "Star Trek into Darkness"? Simple common name. Community consensus can override *any* guideline as they are not universally accepted: "It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply.", and it is what people cannot understand these days, being part of a MoS does not mean it is universally accepted and therefore universally applied. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- COMMONNAME cannot override our manual of style, not least because they address different topics. COMMONNAME is how we decide what the title should be, and our MOS tells us how we render that title. COMMONNAME has nothing to say on matters of style. Powers T 18:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support per MOS:CT. Powers T 18:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - there's nothing in MOS:CT that speaks to words with an omitted letter replaced by an apostrophe. It does state that "every word is given an initial capital except for certain less important words" and _'til is not listed as an exception, in fact, until is listed as a preposition that should be capitalized.. Furthermore, the song is listed as "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough" on sleeves for the Off the Wall album and the single itself, plus it's listed as such on most (if not all) articles on the album, including the wiki page on the album.[1] So, bottom line, without any direction from MOS:CT telling us to not capitalize the word, I see no reason to break from the standard of capitalizing each word in a title. Robman94 (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- It is a preposition with fewer than five letters, and thus falls under the rule that says not to capitalize such prepositions. It doesn't have to be explicitly called out on the guideline page. Powers T 23:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support "'til" is a proposition that has been abbreviated. It should 'ave been uncapitalised if it were spelt out in full, let alone now. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 06:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090629055907/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/artists/michaeljackson/albums/album/259585/review/6067502/off_the_wall to http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/michaeljackson/albums/album/259585/review/6067502/off_the_wall
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64wwV0ML3?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aria.com.au%2Fpages%2Fhttpwww.aria.com.aupageshttpwww.aria.com.aupageshttpwww.aria.com.aupagesARIACharts-Accr.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupageshttpwww.aria.com.aupageshttpwww.aria.com.aupagesARIACharts-Accr.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140828222607/http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=40275&pages= to http://www.australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=40275&pages=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)