Talk:Document classification

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Libraries Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rushastha.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Infringement

Most of the contents of this article is a direct copy of this scholarly article: http://www.academia.edu/1612159/Is_classification_necessary_after_Google 190.140.148.104 (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

..... I think this page should be moved to Text Classification and Document Classification should redirect to Text Classification. Why? Text Classification better describes what the page is about, such classification techniques are not limited to being applied to a whole document of text, they can be applied to portions of text within a document. Also I think this page also belongs in the WikiProject Computer science. Jeff Kubina (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Text Classification is the better name for this page.Johnhenrylawyer (talk) 20:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Classification versus clustering

SemMac (talk) 06:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC) It would be useful if the article makes the distinction between classification and clustering. Classification applies to supervised learning where a teacher gives the categories, while clustering applies to the unsupervised situation.[reply]

The title (Document classification) implies this article is about supervised learning, but the body makes it clear that it covers both supervised and unsupervised learning and the algorithms listed also cover both situations. Unfortunately I can't think of a better title. The alternative word categorization normally also implies supervised learning. For example see http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Text_categorization

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Document classification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]