Talk:Doctor Who series 4

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doctor Who series 4 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doctor Who series 4 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 11, 2008	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
August 20, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Doctor Who High‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Doctor Who campfire trailer was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 October 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Doctor Who series 4. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Not necessary to tell the world Ten regenerates in the first paragraph

I just came here to find out if "The Sontaran Stratagem' was a two-parter or not to see if I had time to watch it between classes! Put that spoiler about David Tennant leaving somewhere else in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.194.148 (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SPOILER - we're an encyclopedia, we don't take note of spoilers. And besides, that happened five years ago. Barely a spoiler. AlexTheWhovian (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't the specials linked here?

They use season 4 production codes and go by 4.15-4.18, as far as the crew of the show are concerned, it's season four. They should be included here, just as Voyage of the damned is considered season 4 because it uses a season 4 production code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.50.71 (talk) 01:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, as there isnt a page for the specials,and if The Next Doctor is on this page we may as well add the specials to this page.81.131.107.180 (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so, should someone insert the special episodes in the table? I can do that. it's obvious that this table, as it is, is terribly misleading because of its incompleteness DeABREU (talk) 16:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 2009 specials may have similair production codes, but that was only for convenience. They were produced entirely independent from Series 4, and as such, they are definitely not part of Series 4. — Edokter • Talk — 17:09, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Doctor Who title 2007.jpg

The image File:Doctor Who title 2007.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate timeline/parallel world

I don't know the exact origin of the term "time beetle", but it's not directly stated on screen in "Turn Left". The insect is only identified as one of the Trickster's Brigade. However, Donna is explicitly mentioned as having a parallel world created around her, rather than it being a common effect of the beetle changing lives (with the universe usually just compensating) after it latches on people's backs, and nowhere is the word "timeline" used in "Turn Left" in referring to that setting where the Doctor dies.

Tenth Doctor: Just got lucky, this thing. It's one of the Trickster's Brigade. Changes a life in tiny little ways. Most times the universe just compensates around it, but with you, great big parallel world.

Donna: Hold on. You said parallel worlds are sealed off.

Tenth Doctor: They are. But you had one created around you. Funny thing is, it seems to be happening a lot to you.

Donna: How do you mean?

Tenth Doctor: Well, the Library, and then this.

Donna: It just goes with the job, I suppose.

Tenth Doctor: Sometimes, I think there's way too much coincidence around you, Donna. I met you once, then I met your grandfather, then I met you again. In the whole wide universe, I met you for a second time. It's like something's binding us together.

Donna: Don't be so daft. I'm nothing special.

Tenth Doctor: Yes, you are. You're brilliant.

Rose: (in flashback) He thought you were brilliant.

Donna: She said that.

Tenth Doctor: Who did?

Donna: That woman. I can't remember.

Tenth Doctor: Well, she never existed, now.

Donna: No, but she said, the stars. She said the stars are going out.

Tenth Doctor: Yeah, but that world's gone.

Donna: No, but she said it was all worlds. Every world. She said the darkness is coming even here.

And prior to her being sent back in time, the only other description of the world is as a "world".

Donna: Who are you?

Rose: I was like you. I used to be you. You've travelled with him, Donna. You've travelled with the Doctor in a different world.

Donna: But I never met him, and he's dead.

Rose: He died underneath the Thames on Christmas Eve, but you were meant to be there. He needed someone to stop him and that was you. You made him leave. You saved his life.

...

Donna: I'm ready.

Rose: One minute past ten.

Donna: Cos I understand now. You said I was gonna die, but you mean this whole world is gonna blink out of existence. But that's not dying, cos a better world takes its place. The Doctor's world, and I'm still alive. That's right, isn't it? I don't die. If I change things, I don't die? That's, that's right, isn't it?

The term "parallel world" is also recalled by Donna in "Journey's End", although the scene also mentions converging timelines (which later in the episode is revealed to be her unique status as a human being with a Time Lord brain than anything).

Donna: In that parallel world, you said something about me.

Rose: The dimension cannon could measure timelines, and it's, it's weird, Donna. They all seem to converge on you.

Donna: I mean, what have I ever done? I'm a temp from Chiswick.

...

Donna: And I got the best bit of the Doctor. I got his mind.

Sarah Jane: So there's three of you?

Rose: Three Doctors?

Jack: I can't tell you what I'm thinking right now.

Tenth Doctor: You're so unique the timelines were converging on you. Human being with a Time Lord brain.

TardisTybort (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Great. Not sure what you're getting at? Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to User:Edokter's undone revision on the 30th here, and why this is misguided to do so almost entirely based on the name "time beetle". Sorry for lack of clarity. TardisTybort (talk) 01:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So I see the term "timelines" mentioned several times. Why do you insist on calling them "parallel worlds"? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 10:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because the mentions to timelines there seem to be more about Donna's Time Lord status than anything (or anything directly) to do with the world seen in "Turn Left". TardisTybort (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Might be relevant to point out the articles on Parallel universe (fiction) and Alternate timeline both make reference to each other (plus several other terms) as amounting to about the same thing. I would lean towards alternate timeline as parallel universe is slightly more suggestive that the world could be more different than what it was in the episode. Cheers, Dresken (talk) 09:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doctor Who (series 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2009-hugo-awards/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821181544/http://www.rts.org.uk/winners-rpa?term_node_tid_depth=123 to http://www.rts.org.uk/winners-rpa?term_node_tid_depth=123

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Doctor Who series 14 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]