User talk:TardisTybort

TardisTybort, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TardisTybort! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Newcastle for you!

Thanks for all your recent work on Time Lord. DonQuixote (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Doctor Who planets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Song. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Master (Doctor Who), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Fraser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Turn Left (Doctor Who) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 08:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistoop (talk • contribs) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coal Hill School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TARDIS may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Centre of the TARDIS" and described by the salvage worker Gregor as "a machine that makes machines"<ref and several [[Squash (sport)#The court|squash courts]].{{citation needed|date=January 2014}}
Doctor's Wife" reveals that the TARDIS is actually capable of manipulating the controls herself (which is consistent with stories in which the TARDIS is summoned or otherwise travels by herself

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who timeline etc...

Hi there. It doesn't matter greatly what exact wording is used in the show. What matters is that the explanations given on Wikipedia are comprehensible to a reader who does not know about it, which is why "alternate timeline" is helpful while "parallel world" isn't. Mezigue (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! TJH2018 talk 15:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TardisTybort. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TardisTybort. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rose (Doctor Who episode), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Doctor Who (season 12) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harry Sullivan

The Ark in Space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harry Sullivan

The Sontaran Experiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harry Sullivan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who (series 4)

Hey there. I've noticed your great work on Doctor Who (series 3) with expanding the episode summaries. I'm updating Doctor Who (series 4) for its Good Article status (see the talk page), and I was wondering if you were interested in expanding the summaries for the fourth series as well? If not, I'm happy to rewatch the episodes and summarize them properly as I watch. Cheers! -- Alex^TW 11:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

		Red Dwarf WikiProject Invitation
		Dear TardisTybort, We have noticed that you are a fan of Red Dwarf and we think you would make a great member of Red Dwarf WikiProject. --Bold and Brash (talk) 04:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon

When you really think about it, the Pokémon themselves have appeared in every single aspect of the franchise, including games, spinoffs and anime, whereas Ash is an anime only character, so basically, aren’t they the main protagonists of the franchise. Kof4456 (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TardisTybort. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex 21's scripts

Thank you for sorting out all those long plot summaries. I don't know if you're aware, but Alex 21 has created a bunch of Javascripts here, including one that can tell you the number of words in an articles plot summary. He also provides clear instructions on use. Just thought it might make your editing easier if you wanted to use it; it proved really useful for me on several American Horror Story episode articles. Kind regards --Ted Edwards 23:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Pokémon films

Hello, TardisTybort. First of all, I commend you for your work on the Pokémon articles, specifically those pertaining to the films and anime. Lately, I've been wondering about getting those films up to GA status, similar to what was done with the James Bond film series (which I'm using as a model), if you're interested in doing so. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Newcastle for you!

Thanks for all your work on reducing the plot summaries. Cheers! DonQuixote (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions for Doctor Who companions

Hello, TardisTybort. I notice that you changed the short descriptions to refer to "Doctor Who" instead of the abbreviated "Dr Who", and I understand your reasoning. You also moved that title to the end of the short description. However, you should be aware that on many devices the short descriptions are truncated at 40 characters. The reason I originally abbreviated it was an attempt to give the most meaningful information in that 40 characters - it would read "Fictional character in the Dr Who TV ser", whereas the expanded version will read "Fictional character in the TV series Doc". I figured it was better to truncate the word "series" rather than losing the most recognizable part of the title. You might like to keep this in mind in future when you "fix" short descriptions, and perhaps even discuss the matter before making bulk changes like that.--Gronk Oz (talk) 01:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dark Water (Doctor Who), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Jane Adventures

Hi, the end credits are sufficient for cast listings as per MOS:TVCAST which does not demand the opening credits. Also references are not necessary for obvious cast ordering based on the credits, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While this might account for Paige and Knight (post Revenge of the Slitheen) and Anthony and Mohindra, the full section you're referring to says: "Please keep in mind that though "main" cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits." That is what the edit reason "Sources are needed for 'starring'" means, because the top of the end credits is just every actor credit with no break and no differentiation between starring/guest starring/co-starring (while the opening titles do single out "starring Elisabeth Sladen".

I'm a little unclear about your phrasing but if by obvious cast ordering you mean how the stars are simply situated at the top, then this would include Knight, Anthony, Paige, and Mohindra, but exclude Armstrong (situated after the actors that play Maria and Rani's parents), and Leeson (bottom of the cast listing, not even a "with" or "and"). TardisTybort (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The End of Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Draconian (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draconian (Doctor Who), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconian (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cartmel Masterplan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cartmel Masterplan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartmel Masterplan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of the Time Lords for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of the Time Lords, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Time Lords until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gallifrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gallifrey, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallifrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]