This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
In the "Problem of Future Contingents" section, it states that: ″This theory approached the doctrine of fate maintained by the Stoics, and Chrysippus is said to have written a work, On Possibility, (Greek: περὶ δυνατῶν), against the views of Diodorus.″
What I do not understand is why Chrysippus' work would have been AGAINST the views of Diodorus? Chrysippus was a famous Stoic philosopher who, among other things, expanded upon Diodorus' propositional logic. So, why would Chrysippus disagree with Diodorus in what seems to be a fundamental point? I think that there might be a mistake here, but I cannot say for sure because I am unfamiliar with the details of the texts that are referenced. If anybody is familiar with Chrysippus' "On Possibility", then please help resolve this question.IonNerd (talk) 01:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)IonNerd[reply]
Yep, you've noticed what a garbled mess this page is. It's a problem I'm afraid of using the venerable Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology to write these pages. I've had a look at Diogenes Laërtius, vii. 191, and there is no reference to a book called "On Possibility against the views of Diodorus," instead there's a book called "On Judgements of Possibility, addressed to Clitus," so that assertion may be wrong. It does appear however, from Cicero and Epictetus, that Chrysippus did argue against Diodorus, specifically on the question of what's possible. Diodorus maintained that the possible is either what is true or what will be true, but Chrysippus argued that even though something is not true and may never be true, it may nevertheless be possible. I've made a minor modification to the page, but the whole thing really needs expanding with modern sources. Singinglemon (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
