Talk:Dinorah

Name of the opera

Both Oxford and Grove list this as Dinorah, ou Le pardon de Ploërmel. Is there any reason why we shouldn't as well? Best.--Kleinzach (talk) 01:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Should it have the comma or not? Be bold. Go ahead and move it. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I've tried to clarify the confusion about this in the text. Le pardon de Ploërmel was in fact the first name of the work under which it was premiered, but it is now almost universally known as Dinorah. And yes, the comma should be correct.

Are you an admin? Unfortunately it's not possibly now to move the article back to Dinorah which is a redirect. (We don't use long opera titles on WP, BTW).--Kleinzach (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Make up your mind! I thought you were requesting above a move to Dinorah, ou Le pardon de Ploërmel. OK, I will move it for you. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Kleinzach (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dinorah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100603195751/http://www.toscaninionline.com:80/disco17.htm to http://www.toscaninionline.com/disco17.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]