Talk:Dinesh Karthik/GA2

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
It seems like this article has a lot of problems from the article with the main immediate failures being in this article as their is a lot of issues compared to the one that was in 2008. There seems to be a lot of ciations needed in certain sections which is a reason to demoted this article because of it. So basically even without going through it fails these criteria:
- Both sections of 1
- 2c - it contains no original research
- And before it was fixed by @Blue Square Thing:, 3a and 3b but their is still problems to be fixed there too.

So I do believe that unless someone works on it for this week. it's probably going to be demoted. HawkAussie (talk) 08:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's no way I have a chance to work on it at all until August really. The whole international section needs gutting and re-writing in a summary style: I agree that as of now it's so far away from a good article that it's laughable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is laughable to say that a Good Article is this type of quality. So therefor, this page will be relegated to a C-rating. HawkAussie (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.