Talk:Diet of Speyer (1529)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Former countries: Holy Roman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force.

Opening header

This article seems short enough to safely accomodate the whole of Protestation at Speyer, in my opinion. The Protestation seems to have been the main event. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather merge them the other way 'round. The Article on the second has nothing but backround to the Protestation, merge it into the Protestation article. While we're at it it's the Protestation of Speyer not at Speyer.Sumergocognito 16:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Second Diet of Speyer and Protestation at Speyer are about different things, like Diet of Worms and Edict of Worms, or Augsburg Confession and Apology of the Augsburg Confession; therefore is better to leave it as is Kmorozov 04:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That works for me too.Sumergocognito 15:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. I've removed the merge tags. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

second diet of speyer???
[edit]
why on earth is this article called "second" diet of speyer? over a period of 500 years there were around 50 diets in speyer. this one certainly was not the second one.--Sundar1 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move discussion in progress
[edit]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First Diet of Speyer which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 10:45, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]