Talk:DiepCity

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 14 March 2023 by reviewer CNMall41 (talk · contribs).

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help me add references

Hi guys I also need your help with this article it has wrong references that does not exist. I need your help adding references so please consider about helping me add references. Uyingcwele (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

@Onel5969:, I decline 99 percent of the articles you send back to draft (you do a great job with those) so wanted to ping you for this since it falls into the 1 percent of those I don't. I am on the fence on notability but given the awards I think this would be better suited for AfD. Just wanted to give you a heads up in case you did not have it on your watchlist. Cheers! CNMall41 (talk) 07:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I feel the same about your AfC reviews as well. And thanks for the heads up. But as I say over at NPP, any other reviewer is free to mark unreview something that I've marked reviewed, or to mark reviewed something I have tagged for issues. The same goes with stuff I draftify. Rarely will I take issue with a veteran AFCer. I agree this is borderline, but NPP has a different focus than AfC. Currently, as it is now sourced, it does not meet GNG, since it only has a single in-depth source. I send stuff like this to draft in the hopes that the article's creator will bolster the sourcing. Now, the only option is AfD, but I'll be doing it as Wikipedia:Using deletion as cleanup, since I feel it probably is notable, just not notable in its current state. Regardless, absolutely no offense taken. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the words. I did leave it tagged. I likely could have declined it as well but let's see if anyone feels it's AfD material. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]