Talk:Die casting

This post contains many absolute statements that may over-simplify the nature of their topics. As well, the posting fails to adequately illustrate the weaknesses and limitations of die casting. In the world of manufacturing and fabrication, all processes have strengths and weaknesses. For instance, this article portrays die casting as universally more economical than machining. But this makes a major presumption of high volumes. In summary, this would benefit from an overhaul by someone who is well versed in both die casting AND competitive processes such as machining, forging, etc. Some engineer 13:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

• I added an advantages and disadvantages section to try an solve this problem. --Wizard191 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Clarification

Is that short tons, metric tons, or long tons? I'm assuming it's a short ton, but all of the other units in the article were in metric so I don't want to make any bum assumptions. --Wizard191 (talk) 22:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I found the answer to my own question. --Wizard191 (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Cold chamber and aluminium alloys

The sentence "these alloys include aluminium, magnesium, copper, and zinc alloys with a large composition of aluminium" doesn't make it clear if the aluminium alloys applies to only zinc or if it applies to magnesium, copper and zinc. Suggest rewriting to be like one of :

• "these include aluminium, zinc alloys with a large composition of aluminium, magnesium and copper"
• "these include aluminium and alloys of magnesium, copper, and zinc, all with a large composition of aluminium"

 Stepho  (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I've fixed it. Wizard191 (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thickness

Shifted this comment from the article to here:  Stepho  (talk) 23:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thickest section should be less than 13 mm (0.5 in).Who ever wrote this knows nothing about diecasting, thickness can range as high as customer requires depending on porosity spec. We make casting as thick as 5 inches thick. Idiot unsigned comment by 07:00, 16 June 2010 99.36.239.61

I check my ref and it states that "the thickness limit is generally less than 13 mm." I did move that info out of the disadvantages section, because it's not really a disadvantage. Wizard191 (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Article Title -Should be Pressure Die Casting?

The title and first paragraph definition imply that 'die casting' refers exclusively to pressure die casting, with no mention of gravity die casting. Either the title should be changed to pressure die casting, with a cross refernce to gravity die casting, or a the distinction should be made clear in the first paragraph. Mundellan (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Die casting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.diecasting.org/faq/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wpi.edu/Images/CMS/MPI/Jorstad.pdf
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5tVCFPCyL?url=http://www.diecasting.org/faq/ to http://www.diecasting.org/faq/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Spelling

The article mixed UK and US spellings (4x mould vs. 12 x mold). The subject isn't country specific, and the earliest version of the article used "mold", so I've changed it to US spelling throughout. (At least for that word - I haven't checked for other spelling differences). Iapetus (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Die casting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606062843/http://www.diecasting.org/faq/alloy_prop.htm to http://www.diecasting.org/faq/alloy_prop.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fastener-world.com.tw/en/article_detail.php?id=21&topage=
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120611082810/http://www.diecasting.com/general-die-casting-design-data-sheet to http://www.diecasting.com/general-die-casting-design-data-sheet

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Integrated Die Casting is not a variant

Reading through the Integrated Die Casting section I realized it's hard for me to pin point exactly what makes integrated die casting different from just die casting. I couldn't answer that question just reading the section on wikipedia so I did further research. Turns out that it's just die casting but at a larger scale than before. While that's a nice talking point for Tesla's marketing it really isn't a different technique.

The section is also written really poorly "...high-level integration of multiple separate and dispersed alloy..." This, I think, is describing the fact that what used to be many individual die cast parts which had to be assembled or welded, is now one single die cast part. That's a really simple idea that is massively complicated by the business/engineering jargon.

The final sentence: "Elon Musk's team first proposed this processing method during the Tesla manufacturing process which is Giga Press program" is both grammatically nonsensical and also mentions "first proposed... during" but then doesn't mention something that could be linked to a time or time line, since the Telsa manufacturing process is not a process that is currently complete. It's a very difficult to understand sentence that has almost no meaning 123.100.229.113 (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)