Talk:Dicksonia antarctica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dicksonia antarctica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance

	Australia portal Dicksonia antarctica is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

earlier comments

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.128.218.206 (talk • contribs)

I don't know why this page is titled the Tasmanian Tree Fern. Soft-tree fern is more commonly used. |

The two terms seem to be used equally. I have moved the page to its scientific name for this reason. SCHZMO ✍ 23:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is UK focused, which is inappropriate for a plant not native to Britain and which is cultivated in a range of countries. 101.173.127.254 (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph

Would it not be more appropriate to have a photograph of a large specimen in its natural habitat, rather that a rather small, sad looking one it a pot in someone's backyard? Glennnnn 01:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. Next time I get to Tasmania I'll take care of it. Only I don't think I'll get to Tasmania (at least not anytime soon). We need to find some Australian Wikipeidans who get down that way to get us a pic. --DanielCD 01:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. There was already a good pic at the commons. SCHZMO ✍ 23:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

This species name has been moved in the relevant plant catalgues to Balantium antarctica following a publication of 2012, as stated in "The Plant List" and the new LCVP (Leipzi catalogue of vascular plants). See http://legacy.tropicos.org/NamePage.aspx?nameid=50183033 and http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-50183030 The LCVP appears to be available as a download from Github only, for the time being. Should this page be renamed and Dicksonia antarctica relay to it instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:695:36A0:3D4B:5AB3:6336:1A48 (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]