Jump to content

Talk:Diana Damrau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Need to wikify (link) this article

[edit]

This article needs full linking (wikifying). For that reason I tagged it, but the tag was removed. I have put it up again. The article needs some basic work as explained at the top of the article. After that has been done the tag should be removed. OK? Regards. - Kleinzach 14:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Lots of anonymous editing. The wikify tag has been removed but the article has only been half (if that) wikified. I am restoring it. - Kleinzach 02:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So, the wikify tag has been removed again! What is happening here? - Kleinzach 03:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems very well wikified to me; what exactly are you objecting to? Valrith 20:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided an example of proper wikifying - the first paragraph. Many other proper names in the other paragraphs and not linked. Have a look and you will see what I mean. Wikifying is not a matter of linking the odd name. Please see the guidance on how to wikify linked through the tag. - Kleinzach 22:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced tag

[edit]

In my view this article is adequately sourced and we should remove the 'unsourced' tag. - Kleinzach 07:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article provides no references whatsoever! How exactly is that adequately sourced? Valrith 20:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The External Links/Sources section gives six websites. Have a look at them and you will be able to verify the substance of the article. If you find anything unverifiable then add an inline 'citation needed' tag - that's the way it's done in this kind of case. Let me know if you have any difficulty with this. - Kleinzach 22:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anon editing by 86.129.72.81

[edit]

Oh dear, once again the anonymous editor using IP 86.129.72.81 has removed the Wikify tag without doing the work of wikifying. . . - Kleinzach 15:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikification and capitalization of foreign language opera titles

[edit]

Delighted to see we are now making progress in wikifying this article. Unfortunately someone has also been anglicizing the capitalization of foreign language opera titles. I will correct but if anyone is interested in this (rather complicated) business the information is at the Opera Project. Basically French, German, and Italian capitalization have their own rules - Kleinzach 23:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=Fun clip of Diana as Rosina

[edit]

If someone knows how to edit in a youtube link or even where, here's a fun clip of her with the Met on the US NBC Late Show with David Letterman, 11/8/06:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeTUKffXtjc

IvyGold (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lyric Coloratura?

[edit]

Just wondering where the citation is for the classification of Ms. Damrau as a lyric coloratura. It is my understanding, both from what I've read and from her voice, that she is a dramatic coloratura. Obviously "cause I say so" isn't enough to edit the article, but a citation should be referenced for her classification. She is also listed as a lyric coloratura on the Fach page. Her homepage is of little help, stating simply "Diana Damrau's extensive repertoire spans the Italian and French Fachs (Gilda/"Rigoletto", Rosina/"Il Barbiere di Siviglia", Leila/"Les pêcheurs de perles"), to the full lyric roles of the German repertoire" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.115.200 (talk) 07:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC) As above, I'm going to edit out 'lyric'; that she is a coloratura there is no debate, of course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.209.205 (talk) 06:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diana Damrau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]