Talk:Di (Chinese concept)

Hang on

This articles does not consist only of a dictionary definition - it is a character that appears in the name of Rinko Kikuchi - A dictionary will never tell you why but this article will. Þjóðólfr (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

This is absurd. According to this rationale we'd have an article for every single Chinese, Japanese and other non-latin alphabet character. This is an English wiki. Mister Flash (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll withdraw speedy if you can come up with some way of renaming it so that it uses latin alphabet character(s). Mister Flash (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

done Þjóðólfr (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

This page is terrible

Thiotholf has a cute name, but his rationale and this page are just terrible.

At the same time, it should not be nuked from admin orbit: all of the generic translation notes and dictionary nonsense should go, but di was in fact an important figure in ancient Chinese ritual and worship. We do need more explanation of that. I'll prune the worst bits, but we need more to replace it with. — LlywelynII 13:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Still needs more, but worst pruned.

Moved to di (Chinese concept) since (a) we should avoid diacritics in the names if at all possible and (b) that particular use completely fails to dab the only important alternate meaning (帝 is also dì). If this page were better, moving di to di (disambiguation) would probably be best. If MOSZH liked using Chinese characters more di (地) would be best, but it's not user-friendly enough for the general Wiki readership. — LlywelynII 19:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Di (Chinese concept). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927141238/http://crlao.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=1207 to http://crlao.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=1207

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)