Talk:Dez Dam
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
[edit]3,340 cubic metres can't be right. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0113468.html says 3340 million cubic metres. Sounds about right for the reservoir volume, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9030197 says 495,000 cubic metres. That sounds like the volume of the dam structure, rather than the reservoir. 3,310 million is the initial size from what i see in sources, maybe 3.3 Billion cubic meters (a conversion) sounds better.
Add importance level. Majidvp (talk) 07:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, almost 6 years later... Should be clarified now. The capacity is closer to 2.6 billion m3.--NortyNort (Holla) 20:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Dez Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110713145427/http://www.khpimc.com/sample-project.htm to http://www.khpimc.com/sample-project.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)