Talk:Dewey Commission
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dewey Commission article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dewey 105.112.212.31 (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Found this
[edit]Hello,
I'm doing research for a different article, and I came across this:
https://spartacus-educational.com/spartacus-blogURL29.html
Have y'all read it? Guylaen (talk) 09:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not only have I read it, last year I emailed the author of the article as follows: "I want to acknowledge that I was the person who included the uncritical bits about Carleton Beals and had labeled the Commission a 'Trotskyist front organization.' At the time I was indeed an apologist of Stalin, looking up to Grover Furr and other 'Stalin did nothing wrong' types. It has been years since I moved away from that position. . . The Wikipedia article hasn't actually improved much since my edits. but just in case you were wondering, it was just one person responsible for the lopsided content." --Ismail (talk) 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance C-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles