Talk:Desert Rain

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

India: Music Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Desert Rain/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements for

Start-Class criteria:
Y An infobox.
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album.
Y A track listing.
N Reference to at least primary personnel by name.
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year.

B-Class criteria:
N All of Start class criteria.
N A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art.
N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section).
N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs.
N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
N A casual reader should learn something about the album.

C-Class criteria:
N All of B-Class criteria.
N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details.
N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians.
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.

Cdl obelix (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 13:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)